The Murder of Catherine Eddowes

In the early hours of 30 September 1888, the gaslit streets of London’s East End were witness to one of the most gruesome double murders in the history of crime. Among the countless desperate and dispossessed who lived in the poverty-stricken alleys of Whitechapel was Catherine Eddowes, a 46-year-old woman whose life, like so many others, had been shaped by hardship. She would become the fourth victim of the killer known as Jack the Ripper, and her death would deepen the atmosphere of fear that hung over the city.

Life in Poverty

Catherine Eddowes was born on 14 April 1842 in Wolverhampton, the sixth of twelve children. Her early years were spent in a working-class household. When she was still a child, her family moved to London, but they later returned to Wolverhampton. Orphaned in her teens, Catherine grew up without the stability of a secure home or steady work.

By her early twenties, she had moved back to London, finding work as a tin plate stamper. It was here she met a man named Thomas Conway, with whom she had three children. They lived together for more than a decade but never married. Catherine eventually left Conway and began a relationship with John Kelly, a labourer who shared her transient lifestyle.

Life for Catherine and John was precarious. Seasonal work in hop fields provided some income, but during the winter months, they often found themselves sleeping in lodging houses or on the streets. Alcohol was a frequent escape from the grinding reality of their existence, a common thread in many lives in the East End.

Whitechapel in 1888

In 1888, Whitechapel was a place where poverty and crime were constant companions. Overcrowded lodging houses, dark courtyards, and narrow alleyways provided cover for all manner of illicit activity. It was here, in the final months of that year, that a series of brutal murders began. The killer targeted women who were living on the margins of society, many of them working as prostitutes to survive.

By late September, three women had already been murdered in horrific fashion: Mary Ann Nichols, Annie Chapman, and Elizabeth Stride. The press had given the unknown killer a name that would echo through history: Jack the Ripper.

The Night of the Murder

On the evening of 29 September 1888, Catherine Eddowes and John Kelly returned to London from Kent, where they had been picking hops. They had little money, and after an argument over their situation, Catherine decided to pawn some of John’s clothes. She later told him she intended to visit her daughter in Bermondsey to borrow money.

That night, Catherine was arrested in Aldgate for drunkenness. She was taken to Bishopsgate Police Station and held in a cell to sober up. At around 1:00 a.m., she was deemed fit to leave and walked out into the dark streets, wearing a black coat, a black skirt, and a white apron.

Instead of heading to her daughter’s home or back to John Kelly, Catherine made her way toward Mitre Square, a dimly lit, cobbled space within the City of London. It was here, sometime between 1:30 and 1:45 a.m., that she encountered Jack the Ripper.

The Discovery

At 1:44 a.m., Police Constable Edward Watkins entered Mitre Square on his regular beat. Only a few minutes earlier, the square had been empty. Now, in the south-west corner, he found the mutilated body of Catherine Eddowes lying on her back.

Her throat had been cut, and her face was slashed with multiple incisions. The killer had cut away part of her nose, and both eyelids bore knife marks. Her abdomen had been opened, and several internal organs had been removed, including a kidney. The brutality of the attack indicated a killer with both skill and a desire to inflict maximum horror.

Watkins immediately blew his whistle for assistance. Constable James Harvey, who had passed the entrance to Mitre Square just minutes before, had seen nothing unusual. The narrow timeframe in which the murder had occurred suggested the killer was both confident and swift.

The Double Event

Catherine Eddowes’ murder was the second killing that night. Less than an hour earlier, Elizabeth Stride had been found dead in Berner Street, her throat cut but without the mutilations seen in the other Ripper cases. Investigators speculated that the killer had been interrupted during the attack on Stride and had gone in search of another victim to satisfy his compulsion. This led to the night being remembered as the “double event.”

The proximity in time between the two murders created an urgency among the police. Multiple forces were now involved, as Catherine’s murder had taken place within the jurisdiction of the City of London Police, while Stride’s had been under the Metropolitan Police. The need for coordination was evident, but communication between the forces was often clumsy and slow.

The Goulston Street Graffito

In the aftermath of the Mitre Square murder, a bloodstained piece of Catherine Eddowes’ apron was found in the doorway of a building in Goulston Street, about a ten-minute walk from the scene. Above it, written in chalk, was a message: “The Juwes are the men that will not be blamed for nothing.”

The meaning of the graffito has been debated ever since. Some believe it was written by the killer as a deliberate attempt to divert suspicion onto the Jewish community, which was already facing tension and prejudice in the East End. Others think it was unrelated, and the apron had been discarded there by chance.

The City Police wanted to photograph the writing, but Sir Charles Warren, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, ordered it erased immediately to prevent anti-Semitic unrest.

The Investigation

The post-mortem examination on Catherine Eddowes was carried out by Dr. Frederick Gordon Brown. He concluded that the killer possessed some anatomical knowledge, as the kidney and uterus had been removed with precision. However, the suggestion that Jack the Ripper was a trained surgeon has remained contentious among experts.

Witnesses offered little in the way of reliable leads. One man, Israel Schwartz, claimed to have seen an altercation with a woman believed to be Elizabeth Stride, but no such sighting was made for Catherine. Joseph Lawende, a witness near Mitre Square, reported seeing a man speaking with a woman matching Catherine’s description shortly before the murder. His description, a man of medium build with a fair complexion, wearing a moustache and a peaked cap, was too vague to lead to an arrest.

Despite house-to-house searches and the questioning of hundreds of residents, no suspect was ever brought to trial for Catherine’s murder or any of the other Ripper killings.

Public Reaction

The murder of Catherine Eddowes, combined with that of Elizabeth Stride, caused panic to surge through Whitechapel and beyond. Newspapers printed graphic accounts of the crime scenes, often exaggerating details to shock their readers. Editorials called for improved street lighting, increased police patrols, and additional resources to combat violent crime.

Public frustration with the police mounted as the killer continued to evade capture. The inability to stop him eroded confidence in law enforcement and fed conspiracy theories that ranged from police incompetence to official cover-ups.

Catherine Eddowes’ Final Resting Place

Catherine Eddowes was buried on 8 October 1888 in an unmarked pauper’s grave in the City of London Cemetery in Manor Park. The service was attended by her common-law husband, John Kelly, and a small group of family and friends. In later years, a plaque was placed at the site to mark her resting place, finally giving her a memorial.

Her death, like those of the other canonical Ripper victims, has continued to draw interest from historians, crime writers, and amateur detectives. She is often remembered not just as a victim of Jack the Ripper, but as a woman who endured the brutal realities of poverty in Victorian London.

Legacy of the Murder

The killing of Catherine Eddowes remains one of the most infamous crimes in British history. The “double event” stands out even in the grim catalogue of Jack the Ripper’s murders, both for its brazenness and for the insight it gives into the killer’s behaviour. The precision of the mutilations, the daring in choosing Mitre Square, an area patrolled by the City Police, and the mysterious Goulston Street graffito have all kept her case central to the endless debates over the Ripper’s identity. For the people of the East End in 1888, Catherine’s murder was more than just a headline. It was a reminder that in the dark maze of Whitechapel’s streets, no one was beyond the reach of the killer. And for modern readers, her story remains a sobering glimpse into a world where poverty and danger walked hand in hand, and where justice was a promise too often left unfulfilled.

---

The Murder of Catherine Eddowes FAQ